Stan Gibson posted “Motion to Disqualify Based on Joint Defense Agreement Denied Where Agreement Did Not Create Implied Attorney-Client Relationship,” on the Patent Lawyer Blog on January 23rd, 2019.
Stan Gibson and Nahal Bahri’s article, “Preparing to Discuss Predictive Coding at the Rule 26(f) Conference,” was published by Wolters Kluwer in the March 2015 issue of The Computer & Internet Lawyer.
Stan Gibson’s article entitled, “Motion to Strike Expert Testimony in Comples Case Denied,” was published in the November 2014 issue of the IP Litigator.
Stan Gibson’s blog article, “Fujitsu v. Tellabs: The District Court Orders Additional Sanctions for Fujitsu’s Continued ‘Contemptuous Conduct,’” was picked up by Today’s General Counsel.
Stan Gibson and Nahal Bahri wrote “Chapter 9: Preparing to Discuss Predictive Coding at the Rule 26(f) Conference” which was included in PLI’s Course Handbook for the Electronic Discovery Institute, 2014.
By Stan Gibson and Greg Cordrey Download the PDF: Can Your DNA Be Patented? The Supreme Court Draws A Delicate Balance This article was originally published in the Orange County Business Journal. In Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court held that a naturally occurring, isolated segment of DNA is a product […]
Stan Gibson’s blog article, “Pre-Filing Investigation At ITC Protected From Discovery,” was republished by IP Frontline.
Bloomberg BNA has published the 2012 update to the BNA Portfolio, “Records Retention for Enterprise Knowledge Management,” authored by Bob Braun, Stan Gibson, Michael Gold and Dan Sedor. The portfolio was first released in 2007.
Stan Gibson’s article, “Apple’s landslide victory over Samsung in a US District Court does not mark the end of the so called smart phone ‘patent wars,’” was published in the E-Commerce Law Report.
Stan Gibson’s blog article titled, “Apple v. Samsung: Samsung Moves to Preclude Apple from Commenting on Samsung’s Failure to Call Certain Witnesses at Trial,” was reprinted by Corporate LiveWire.