California’s Proposition 65, formally known as the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, is a law designed to protect California residents from exposure to harmful chemicals. However, its expansive scope and strict compliance requirements have made it a frequent source of litigation, presenting significant challenges for businesses operating in the state. This […]
The California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) is driving a wave of litigation that could significantly impact businesses with consumer-facing websites. Hundreds of lawsuits have been filed recently alleging that businesses operating in California violated CIPA due to very common software and business practices found on their websites. Initially intended to regulate law enforcement’s use […]
An article by Dan Quinley titled “‘Finality’ may be the next key issue in takings litigation,” was published by the Daily Journal on October 22, 2020.
An article by Stan Gibson titled “Deepfakes: dangers and developments,” was published by the Los Angeles Daily Journal on July 2, 2020.
The article “Financial Elder Abuse in the COVID-19 Environment,” published by the Daily Journal was authored by Vatche Zetjian and Neil Erickson of Jeffer Mangels Butler & Mitchell LLP. Read the article here.
One often doesn’t know the extent of one’s insurance coverage until a calamity occurs. So it is with force majeure provisions in contracts Typically, force majeure provisions are included in contracts to excuse a party from contractual obligations if some unforeseen event beyond its control prevents performance of its contractual obligations. As of March 2, […]
Rod Berman and Jessica Bromall Sparkman wrote the article, “The race to register: Will copyright applicants win or lose?” published by the Daily Journal. The article focuses on Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-Street.com, LLC (17-571), which is on the U.S. Supreme Court’s docket for its upcoming term. The high court’s decision will resolve a long-standing […]
Susan Allison wrote the article “Anti-SLAPP Motions: Courts Taking a Much Closer Look,” published in The Recorder.
This article was first published by Law360 in February 2018 and is reprinted with permission. In Gaynor v. Bulen,1 California’s Court of Appeal recently articulated the proper approach for determining whether allegations constitute protected activity under the anti-SLAPP statute,2 a standard most recently clarified by the California Supreme Court in Baral v. Schnitt (“Baral“),3 and Park […]
Susan Allison’s article “Welcome Anti-SLAPP Guidance For Calif. Courts, Litigants” was published by Law360.