Stan Gibson’s article “District Court Stays Case Pending Inter Partes Review After Non-Petitioning Defendant Agrees to Be Bound By Estoppel Provisions” was published by Mondaq.
Patent Litigation Group
Stan Gibson and Nahal Bahri’s article, “Preparing to Discuss Predictive Coding at the Rule 26(f) Conference,” was published by Wolters Kluwer in the March 2015 issue of The Computer & Internet Lawyer.
Stan Gibson’s article entitled, “Motion to Strike Expert Testimony in Comples Case Denied,” was published in the November 2014 issue of the IP Litigator.
Greg Cordrey’s article was published in the November 2014 issue of the IP Litigator entitled, “Stay of Litigation Granted Due to Patent Owners Failure to Timely Respond.”
Stan Gibson’s blog article, “Fujitsu v. Tellabs: The District Court Orders Additional Sanctions for Fujitsu’s Continued ‘Contemptuous Conduct,’” was picked up by Today’s General Counsel.
Greg Cordrey’s article, “IPR Proceedings Filed Eight Months Apart is Too Long to Permit Rejoinder,” was published by the Organization of Legal Professionals.
By Stan Gibson and Greg Cordrey Download the PDF: Can Your DNA Be Patented? The Supreme Court Draws A Delicate Balance This article was originally published in the Orange County Business Journal. In Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., the Supreme Court held that a naturally occurring, isolated segment of DNA is a product […]
Stan Gibson’s blog article, “Pre-Filing Investigation At ITC Protected From Discovery,” was republished by IP Frontline.
Stan Gibson’s article, “Apple’s landslide victory over Samsung in a US District Court does not mark the end of the so called smart phone ‘patent wars,’” was published in the E-Commerce Law Report.
Stan Gibson’s blog article titled, “Apple v. Samsung: Samsung Moves to Preclude Apple from Commenting on Samsung’s Failure to Call Certain Witnesses at Trial,” was reprinted by Corporate LiveWire.